Start free
Walk into every session already knowing where you left off — what was decided, what changed since, and what is still open. Without writing session notes, and without a CRM to fill in.
Mentoring one founder is easy to hold in your head. Following eight or ten is a different job. Each has a distinct arc — a pivot in March, a co-founder conversation you promised to revisit, a hiring decision that was still open last time. None of it is complicated on its own. What makes it hard is that you switch between them every few days, and each switch costs a reconstruction.
So the fifteen minutes before a session get spent skimming old notes, or the session opens with "remind me where we landed on..." — which puts the work of remembering onto the person you are meant to be helping.
The common failure is the same in all three: they store what happened and leave you to reconstruct what it means. That gap has a name — cognitive continuity — and it is the actual problem.
Live Capture runs during the call and picks up the conversation, including the other participants. If you would rather not record, dictate a couple of minutes afterwards — it works the same way. Documents and decks can be dropped in too.
Decisions, action items and open questions are pulled out automatically, and the session joins everything else about that person. No tagging, no folders, no naming convention to keep up.
Where things stand today, the milestones that got them here, which decisions are in effect, which were superseded, and what is still unresolved. Ten seconds instead of fifteen minutes.
One workspace per person you follow — current without being maintained
Once each founder has their own project, a single question can be asked across all of them at once. Search “go-to-market” and you get one reading per company: who shifted approach and when, who has not touched it in two months, what is still unresolved.
This is the view that does not exist anywhere else, because it requires the per-person context to already be structured. It is useful to you as a mentor, and it is the view a program director normally has to request as a status update from everyone.
Because positions are kept with their dates rather than overwritten, a change of direction stays visible instead of silently replacing what came before. You can see that a founder held one view of their ICP for four months and now holds another — which is often the most useful thing to raise in the next session, and the easiest thing to miss when you only see the current state.
It is descriptive, never a score. Changing your mind is usually evidence of learning; the point is to notice it, not to grade it.
Mentoring runs on candour, and candour depends on confidentiality. That constraint shaped how the product works rather than being added to it afterwards.
If you mentor through an accelerator, this is what lets you keep your own working context separate from what the program sees.
"My-CoMind has helped take my workflow to a new level. It lets me organize my clients, scale my operations, and deliver more relevant, actionable guidance — all without adding more work to my day."
Five questions on how many evolving contexts you hold, and how much of that history would survive if one relationship moved to someone else. There is a path for founders and for programs too.
Take the Context Load Audit → Nothing is stored.